People v. Cotton

109 A.D.3d 1206, 971 N.Y.S.2d 916
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cotton. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.3d 1564

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered October 8, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and failing to signal.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]) and failing to signal (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1163 [b]). Defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved for our review because “his motion for a trial order of dismissal was not specifically directed at the grounds advanced on appeal” (People v Wright, 107 AD3d 1398, 1401 [2013]; see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). Further, defendant’s posttrial motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 was insufficient to preserve for our review that contention (see People v Jones, 85 AD3d 1667, 1668 [2011], lv denied 19 NY3d 974 [2012]), and we decline to exercise our power to review it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). Present — Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Garni and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cotton, 109 A.D.3d 1206, 971 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

109 A.D.3d 1206 (People v. Cotton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Jones
85 A.D.3d 1667 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Wright
107 A.D.3d 1398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)