People v. Cotto

160 N.Y.S.3d 875, 203 A.D.3d 492, 2022 NY Slip Op 01520
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 10, 2022
DocketInd No. 1454/06 Appeal No. 15487 Case No. 2017-2161
StatusPublished

This text of 160 N.Y.S.3d 875 (People v. Cotto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cotto, 160 N.Y.S.3d 875, 203 A.D.3d 492, 2022 NY Slip Op 01520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Cotto (2022 NY Slip Op 01520)
People v Cotto
2022 NY Slip Op 01520
Decided on March 10, 2022
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 10, 2022
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, González, Shulman, Rodriguez, JJ.

Ind No. 1454/06 Appeal No. 15487 Case No. 2017-2161

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Albert Cotto, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Julia L. Chariott of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John S. Moore, J.), entered on or about February 25, 2016, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to to defer defendant's SORA adjudication pending the outcome of an article 10 civil commitment proceeding (see e.g. People v Thomas, 179 AD3d 444, 445 [1st Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 908 [2020]; People v Powell, 170 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 33 NY3d 908 [2019]; see also People v Gordon, 147 AD3d 988 [2d Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 910 [2017]). The timing of the adjudication was consistent with Correction Law § 168-n and the requirements of due process. We find no basis to distinguish this case from our repeated

past holdings regarding such exercises of discretion. We have considered and rejected

defendant's remaining arguments.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 10, 2022



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gordon
2017 NY Slip Op 1241 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Thomas
2020 NY Slip Op 84 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 N.Y.S.3d 875, 203 A.D.3d 492, 2022 NY Slip Op 01520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cotto-nyappdiv-2022.