People v. Cotto
This text of 151 A.D.2d 691 (People v. Cotto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered May 23, 1988, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant received the sentence he bargained for and should not be heard to complain on appeal (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). The defendant’s claim that the court failed to exercise its discretion in imposing sentence is refuted by the minutes of the sentencing. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A.D.2d 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cotto-nyappdiv-1989.