People v. Cossentino

199 N.E.2d 511, 14 N.Y.2d 750, 250 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1168
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 7, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 511 (People v. Cossentino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cossentino, 199 N.E.2d 511, 14 N.Y.2d 750, 250 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1168 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

On the basis of the preconviction and postconviction psychiatric .studies of defendant-appellant made in 1962 and the suggestion by his counsel on the argument of the appeal relating to his present mental condition, decision is withheld until a further psychiatric examination is made of defendant-appellant under the order and direction of the Supreme Court of Queens County and appropriate findings in respect thereof have been made.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan. Taking no part: Judge Scileppi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cossentino
343 N.E.2d 768 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 511, 14 N.Y.2d 750, 250 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cossentino-ny-1964.