People v. Coscia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Coscia

26 A.D.2d 649, 272 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 649 (People v. Coscia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coscia, 26 A.D.2d 649, 272 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 13,1964, which granted the defendants’ motion to the extent of setting aside a search warrant and suppressing the evidence obtained thereunder. As to defendant Thomas Coscia, order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. The information filed against Vincent Taddeo is dismissed. In our opinion, the observations made by the officer were made of typical gambling activities being engaged in by the defendant Coscia (People v. Valentine, 17 N Y 2d 128; cf. United States v. Ventresca, 380 U. S. 102). The activities extended to the home of the defendant Coscia and gave rise to probable cause for believing he was committing a crime. The death of the defendant Vincent Taddeo has rendered his appeal moot. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [42 Misc 2d 978.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 13,1964, which granted the defendants’ motion to the extent of setting aside a search warrant and suppressing the evidence obtained thereunder. As to defendant Thomas Coscia, order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. The information filed against Vincent Taddeo is dismissed. In our opinion, the observations made by the officer were made of typical gambling activities being engaged in by the defendant Coscia (People v. Valentine, 17 N Y 2d 128; cf. United States v. Ventresca, 380 U. S. 102). The activities extended to the home of the defendant Coscia and gave rise to probable cause for believing he was committing a crime. The death of the defendant Vincent Taddeo has rendered his appeal moot. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [42 Misc 2d 978.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 649, 272 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coscia-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack