People v. Cortez

256 A.D.2d 155, 683 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13770
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cortez. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 A.D.2d 450

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Alpert, J.), rendered March 10, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record of the plea proceedings establishes that defendant’s right to appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress physical evidence was knowingly, intelligently, and specifically waived as part of his negotiated plea bargain (People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Aponte, 212 AD2d 157). Appellate review of this issue is thus foreclosed.

Since the waiver was expressly limited to the suppression issue, review of the sentence is not foreclosed. However, there was clearly no abuse of sentencing discretion in light of defendant’s violations of the various conditions imposed. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cortez, 256 A.D.2d 155, 683 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 155 (People v. Cortez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Aponte
212 A.D.2d 157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)