People v. Corso

183 A.D.2d 774, 583 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6756
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 183 A.D.2d 774 (People v. Corso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Corso, 183 A.D.2d 774, 583 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6756 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered March 22, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress all evidence obtained as the result of certain eavesdropping warrants.

Ordered that this judgment is affirmed.

[775]*775Prior to the court’s acceptance of his plea of guilty, the defendant, through counsel, withdrew "all motions * * * already ruled upon * * * or presently before [the] court”, thereby withdrawing his pre-trial motion to suppress tape-recordings obtained under the authority of certain eavesdropping warrants. Accordingly, the defendant waived his right to seek review of the trial court’s suppression ruling upon appeal from the judgment of conviction (see, People v Battista, 167 AD2d 344).

Our review of the plea allocution indicates that the defendant, who was not a stranger to the criminal justice system, was fully advised of his rights, readily admitted his guilt, and was at all times ably represented by counsel. His present claim that he did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently enter into the plea agreement is therefore without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Thompson, 140 AD2d 652; People v Sickler, 117 AD2d 880).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including his claim of excessive sentence, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Robinson
13 A.D.3d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Prashad
260 A.D.2d 507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Spearman
226 A.D.2d 180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Addison
196 A.D.2d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 A.D.2d 774, 583 N.Y.S.2d 505, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-corso-nyappdiv-1992.