People v. Corso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Corso

24 A.D.2d 1008, 266 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2825

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 1008 (People v. Corso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Corso, 24 A.D.2d 1008, 266 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 26, 1964 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, the defendant evinced no proper ground for invoking the discretion of the sentencing court so as to allow the withdrawal of his plea of guilty. Counsel’s present claims that the defendant was insane at the time of his plea and at the time of sentence are not sustained by the almost contemporaneous psychiatric report which the sentencing court had before it. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 26, 1964 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, and imposing sentence as a second felony offender. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, the defendant evinced no proper ground for invoking the discretion of the sentencing court so as to allow the withdrawal of his plea of guilty. Counsel’s present claims that the defendant was insane at the time of his plea and at the time of sentence are not sustained by the almost contemporaneous psychiatric report which the sentencing court had before it. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 1008, 266 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-corso-nyappdiv-1965.