People v. Correa

93 A.D.3d 473, 939 N.Y.S.2d 846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Correa. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 555

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), entered on or about May 20, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it granted a downward departure to risk level two, but declined to grant a further departure (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). After weighing the extreme seriousness of defendant’s criminal conduct against the mitigating factors he cites, we conclude that departure to the lowest risk level would not be appropriate. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Correa, 93 A.D.3d 473, 939 N.Y.S.2d 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

93 A.D.3d 473 (People v. Correa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)