People v. Corn

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Corn

722 N.W.2d 869, 477 Mich. 903

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 31, 2006

Docket131606

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 722 N.W.2d 869 (People v. Corn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Corn, 722 N.W.2d 869, 477 Mich. 903 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Summary Dispositions October 31, 2006.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court for a determination of whether defendant is indigent and, if so, for the appointment of appellate counsel, in light of Halbert v Michigan, 545 US 605 (2005). Appointed counsel may file an application for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the trial court, within 12 months of the date of the circuit court's order appointing counsel, in accord with the deadlines in effect at the time defendant was denied counsel. See MCR 7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429. Counsel may, but is not required to, include those issues defendant raised in his application for leave to appeal to this Court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summary Dispositions October 31, 2006.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Muskegon Circuit Court for a determination of whether defendant is indigent and, if so, for the appointment of appellate counsel, in light of Halbert v Michigan, 545 US 605 (2005). Appointed counsel may file an application for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeals, and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the trial court, within 12 months of the date of the circuit court's order appointing counsel, in accord with the deadlines in effect at the time defendant was denied counsel. See MCR 7.205(F)(3), MCR 6.311, and MCR 6.429. Counsel may, but is not required to, include those issues defendant raised in his application for leave to appeal to this Court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 N.W.2d 869, 477 Mich. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-corn-mich-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack