People v. Corie

196 Misc. 1029, 93 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2992
New York County Courts·Decided December 31, 1949·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Connor, J.

The defendant, not being represented by counsel at the time, pleaded guilty to a violation of paragraph (a) of subdivision 5 of section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, the information charging that he did sell or give away a bottle of beer at 12:45 on a Sunday morning. The defendant was not a licensee and the information did not allege that he was a licensee.

No person other than a licensee can be guilty of violating section 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, since the Legislature apparently intended that the licensee and he alone [1030] should be responsible for the conduct of the premises. As was stated in People v. Flanagan (152 Misc. 916, 917): “ There is nothing in the law * * * making any of the provisions of section 106 applicable to a person other than the licensee.”

A criminal statute must be strictly construed. (People v. Schmidt, 221 App. Div. 77.) A person who pleads guilty to an information that charges no crime should and must have his conviction reversed.

The judgment of conviction herein is a nullity. Judgment appealed from reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Corie, 196 Misc. 1029, 93 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2992 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1949).

196 Misc. 1029 (People v. Corie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stentella
83 Misc. 2d 515 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1975)
People v. Monahan
69 Misc. 2d 273 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1972)
People v. O'Neil
280 A.D. 145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)