People v. Coriano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Coriano

26 A.D.3d 299, 810 N.Y.S.2d 65

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.3d 299 (People v. Coriano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coriano, 26 A.D.3d 299, 810 N.Y.S.2d 65 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J., at hearing; John Cataldo, J., at plea and sentence), rendered February 7, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

[300]*300The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The court properly resolved a conflict between two officers’ recollections as to the circumstances of a photographic identification, and the record also supports the court’s findings as to the subsequent identifications. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J., at hearing; John Cataldo, J., at plea and sentence), rendered February 7, 2003, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

[300]*300The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress identification evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The court properly resolved a conflict between two officers’ recollections as to the circumstances of a photographic identification, and the record also supports the court’s findings as to the subsequent identifications. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.3d 299, 810 N.Y.S.2d 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coriano-nyappdiv-2006.