People v. Cordice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cordice

306 A.D.2d 354, 760 N.Y.S.2d 670, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6490

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 354 (People v. Cordice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cordice, 306 A.D.2d 354, 760 N.Y.S.2d 670, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered November 14, 2000, convicting him of criminal mischief in the second degree, petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s charge to the jury regarding accomplice liability did not unlawfully amend the indictment or impermissibly introduce a new theory of culpability into the case (see People v Rivera, 84 NY2d 766, 769 [1995]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are not reviewable or are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, McGinity, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI