People v. Cordero

266 A.D.2d 467, 698 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11990
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cordero. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D.2d 372

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered January 26, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[468]*468The defendant contends that he was improperly adjudicated a second felony offender on the ground that the procedures set forth in CPL 400.21 were not followed. However, there was sufficient compliance with the requirements of CPL 400.21 (see, People v Witherspoon, 155 AD2d 636; see also, People v Bouyea, 64 NY2d 1140). In addition, since the defendant received the agreed-updn sentence, he cannot now complain that it was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cordero, 266 A.D.2d 467, 698 N.Y.S.2d 530, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 467 (People v. Cordero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bouyea
480 N.E.2d 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
People v. Witherspoon
155 A.D.2d 636 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)