People v. Cordero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cordero

212 A.D.2d 624, 623 N.Y.S.2d 140

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings [625]*625County (Meyer, J.), imposed April 28, 1992, under S.C.I. No. 7959/90, (2) an amended sentence of the same court (Kramer, J.), imposed July 14, 1992, under Indictment No. 13277/89, and (3) a sentence of the same court (Lewis, J.), imposed August 20, 1992, under Indictment No. 3765/92.

Ordered that the sentences and amended sentence are affirmed.

The sentence imposed on April 28, 1992, was the minimum for the defendant’s conviction of a class C felony as a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3], [4]). In addition, the sentence imposed on August 20, 1992, was the result of a negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

As to the amended sentence imposed on July 14, 1992, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that it is harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings [625]*625County (Meyer, J.), imposed April 28, 1992, under S.C.I. No. 7959/90, (2) an amended sentence of the same court (Kramer, J.), imposed July 14, 1992, under Indictment No. 13277/89, and (3) a sentence of the same court (Lewis, J.), imposed August 20, 1992, under Indictment No. 3765/92.

Ordered that the sentences and amended sentence are affirmed.

The sentence imposed on April 28, 1992, was the minimum for the defendant’s conviction of a class C felony as a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3], [4]). In addition, the sentence imposed on August 20, 1992, was the result of a negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

As to the amended sentence imposed on July 14, 1992, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that it is harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

People v. Cordero, 212 A.D.2d 624, 623 N.Y.S.2d 140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

212 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Cordero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related