People v. Cordero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cordero

212 A.D.2d 624, 623 N.Y.S.2d 140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 624 (People v. Cordero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cordero, 212 A.D.2d 624, 623 N.Y.S.2d 140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings [625]*625County (Meyer, J.), imposed April 28, 1992, under S.C.I. No. 7959/90, (2) an amended sentence of the same court (Kramer, J.), imposed July 14, 1992, under Indictment No. 13277/89, and (3) a sentence of the same court (Lewis, J.), imposed August 20, 1992, under Indictment No. 3765/92.

Ordered that the sentences and amended sentence are affirmed.

The sentence imposed on April 28, 1992, was the minimum for the defendant’s conviction of a class C felony as a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3], [4]). In addition, the sentence imposed on August 20, 1992, was the result of a negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

As to the amended sentence imposed on July 14, 1992, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that it is harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings [625]*625County (Meyer, J.), imposed April 28, 1992, under S.C.I. No. 7959/90, (2) an amended sentence of the same court (Kramer, J.), imposed July 14, 1992, under Indictment No. 13277/89, and (3) a sentence of the same court (Lewis, J.), imposed August 20, 1992, under Indictment No. 3765/92.

Ordered that the sentences and amended sentence are affirmed.

The sentence imposed on April 28, 1992, was the minimum for the defendant’s conviction of a class C felony as a second felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3], [4]). In addition, the sentence imposed on August 20, 1992, was the result of a negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

As to the amended sentence imposed on July 14, 1992, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that it is harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Miller, Copertino and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 624, 623 N.Y.S.2d 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cordero-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack