People v. Cordero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cordero

159 A.D.2d 512

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 512 (People v. Cordero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cordero, 159 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered June 3, 1988.

[513]*513Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

The defendant’s contention that his plea was defective because there was no interpreter at the proceeding is without merit (see, e.g., People v Navarro, 134 AD2d 460). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered June 3, 1988.

[513]*513Ordered that the judgment is affirmed (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816).

The defendant’s contention that his plea was defective because there was no interpreter at the proceeding is without merit (see, e.g., People v Navarro, 134 AD2d 460). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cordero-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack