People v. Corales

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Corales

437 N.E.2d 281, 56 N.Y.2d 767, 452 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3413

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 18, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 437 N.E.2d 281 (People v. Corales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Corales, 437 N.E.2d 281, 56 N.Y.2d 767, 452 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3413 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed. The contentions that the People were required to produce other proof at the suppression hearing and that the court’s charge to the jury impermissibly shifted the burden of proof were not preserved for our review. Appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed. The contentions that the People were required to produce other proof at the suppression hearing and that the court’s charge to the jury impermissibly shifted the burden of proof were not preserved for our review. Appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

437 N.E.2d 281, 56 N.Y.2d 767, 452 N.Y.S.2d 22, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-corales-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack