People v. Cora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cora

18 A.D.2d 681, 236 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6496

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 681 (People v. Cora) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cora, 18 A.D.2d 681, 236 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered January 19, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree (two counts), and imposing sentence upon him as a fourth felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Even if it be assumed, without deciding, that the defendant’s statement, made in the absence of counsel following his arrest two days prior to his arraignment, was inadmissible (cf. People v. Wallace, 17 A D 2d 981), we are of the opinion that the failure to object to its admission precludes reversal, in view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt (People v. Gallo, 16 A D 2d 795, reversed on other grounds 12 N Y 2d 12). We have examined the other points raised by defendant but find no merit in any of them. Beldock, P. J., Hghetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County, rendered January 19, 1962 after a jury trial, convicting him of grand larceny in the first degree (two counts), and imposing sentence upon him as a fourth felony offender. Judgment affirmed. Even if it be assumed, without deciding, that the defendant’s statement, made in the absence of counsel following his arrest two days prior to his arraignment, was inadmissible (cf. People v. Wallace, 17 A D 2d 981), we are of the opinion that the failure to object to its admission precludes reversal, in view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt (People v. Gallo, 16 A D 2d 795, reversed on other grounds 12 N Y 2d 12). We have examined the other points raised by defendant but find no merit in any of them. Beldock, P. J., Hghetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 681, 236 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cora-nyappdiv-1962.