People v. Copeland

276 A.D.2d 709, 715 N.Y.S.2d 641, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10865
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Copeland. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D.2d 985

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered October 30, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that he was penalized for exercising his right to a jury trial (see, People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, cert denied 449 US 1087; People v Goolsby, 213 AD2d 722).

The County Court considered the appropriate factors in sentencing the defendant, and the sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Copeland, 276 A.D.2d 709, 715 N.Y.S.2d 641, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 709 (People v. Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pena
406 N.E.2d 1347 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Goolsby
213 A.D.2d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)