People v. Copeland

201 A.D.2d 374, 609 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Copeland. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 A.D.2d 280

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic S. Berman, J., at hearing; Rena K. Uviller, J., at trial), rendered November 21, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony was properly denied, defendant having been identified at a prompt, at-the-scene showup (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541, 545).

The challenged portions of the People’s summation did not [375]*375exceed the bounds of proper advocacy (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399), and would, in any event, be considered harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Copeland, 201 A.D.2d 374, 609 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 374 (People v. Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Duuvon
571 N.E.2d 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)