People v. Cooper

106 A.D.3d 466, 965 N.Y.S.2d 868

This text of 106 A.D.3d 466 (People v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Cooper, 106 A.D.3d 466, 965 N.Y.S.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cassandra Mullen, J.), entered on or about August 2, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request for a downward departure (see People v Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], cert denied 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant are outweighed by his serious criminal record.

Both the underlying sex crime and a prior sex crime involved eight-year-old victims, and defendant has twice been convicted of failing to register in connection with a prior sex offender adjudication. We do not consider defendant’s sex crimes to be exceedingly remote, particularly since he spent much of the intervening time in prison, and we do not find his age (early 40s) to be a significant mitigating factor under the circumstances. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Knox
903 N.E.2d 1149 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
In re Kalil
130 S. Ct. 554 (Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.3d 466, 965 N.Y.S.2d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cooper-nyappdiv-2013.