People v. Cooper

67 A.D.3d 700, 886 N.Y.S.2d 896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D.3d 678

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 25, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief (see People v Williams, 63 AD3d 1183 [2009]; People v Moriah, 52 AD3d 534 [2008]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cooper, 67 A.D.3d 700, 886 N.Y.S.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 700 (People v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Moriah
52 A.D.3d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Williams
63 A.D.3d 1183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)