People v. Cooper

216 A.D.2d 951, 629 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7329
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 A.D.2d 24

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) is not against the weight of evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

Defendant’s further contention is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Law-ton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cooper, 216 A.D.2d 951, 629 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 951 (People v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)