People v. Cooper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cooper

112 A.D.2d 2, 490 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50621

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.2d 2 (People v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cooper, 112 A.D.2d 2, 490 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree (Penal Law § 165.50), arguing that the evidence was legally insufficient and that the court’s supplemental charge was erroneous.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196), was legally sufficient to establish each element of the crime. Defendant’s challenges involve issues of credibility, not legal sufficiency.

We have considered the other points raised and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Corning, J. — criminal possession of stolen property, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree (Penal Law § 165.50), arguing that the evidence was legally insufficient and that the court’s supplemental charge was erroneous.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Kennedy, 47 NY2d 196), was legally sufficient to establish each element of the crime. Defendant’s challenges involve issues of credibility, not legal sufficiency.

We have considered the other points raised and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Corning, J. — criminal possession of stolen property, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Green and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 2, 490 N.Y.S.2d 378, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 50621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cooper-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack