People v. Cooney

9 N.Y.S. 285, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1000, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 130
New York Court of Common Pleas·Decided February 3, 1890·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The forfeiture of the recognizance herein should be vacated, and canceled, as after the default the principal appeared and pleaded guilty, and was fined, which fine was paid, and the people have lost no rights by the first default.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cooney, 9 N.Y.S. 285, 29 N.Y. St. Rep. 1000, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 130 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

9 N.Y.S. 285 (People v. Cooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Levy
34 N.Y. Crim. 29 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)
State ex rel. Gabe v. Main
119 P. 844 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)