People v. Coon
This text of 45 Cal. 672 (People v. Coon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The indictment charges that the defendant stole five certificates of shares of stock, so called, of the number 7,056 of the Savage Mining Company, etc. The plain import of that is that the shares alleged to have been stolen were of a series of certificates—such certificates bearing the number 7,056—and it became necessary for the prosecution to prove that the defendant stole one or more of this series of certificates.
The proof upon this point, however, was that the certificate actually claimed to have been stolen was not one of the series alleged in the indictment; that in fact there was no such series ever in existence, and that the certificate which was the subject of the supposed larceny was single, there being but one of that number.
That the certificates named in the indictment were more than one, and were of a series bearing a uniform number, [673]*673became a material part of the description of the property stolen; in fact, besides the designation of the number of the certificates, there is no other description set forth, for the number of shares represented by the certificates is not alleged, and we think that there was a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof in respect of the description.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 Cal. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coon-cal-1873.