People v. Conway

186 A.D.2d 995, 590 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Conway. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 1050

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish that she had been driving while intoxicated. The uncontroverted trial testi[996]*996mony was sufficient to establish that defendant had been operating a motor vehicle while she was "incapable of employing the physical and mental abilities which [she was] expected to possess in order to operate a vehicle as a reasonable and prudent driver” (People v Cruz, 48 NY2d 419, 428, appeal dismissed 446 US 901; see, People v Cole, 178 AD2d 1016; People v DeBlase, 142 AD2d 926; People v Ottomanelli, 107 AD2d 212, 216-217, lv denied 66 NY2d 617).

We have examined defendant’s other contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Forma, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Conway, 186 A.D.2d 995, 590 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 995 (People v. Conway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cruz
399 N.E.2d 513 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Ottomanelli
107 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. DeBlase
142 A.D.2d 926 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Cole
178 A.D.2d 1016 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)