People v. Contreras
124 A.D.2d 669, 507 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61968
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Contreras. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 A.D.2d 627 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1986·Published
Opinion
Contrary to defendant’s claim, the evidence of his guilt of both offenses, including the required proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, was overwhelming (see, People v Bongarzone, 116 AD2d 164; People v Menache, 98 AD2d 335). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Contreras, 124 A.D.2d 669, 507 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
124 A.D.2d 669 (People v. Contreras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Menache
98 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Bongarzone
116 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)