People v. Contreras
124 A.D.2d 669, 507 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61968
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1986
StatusPublished
This text of 124 A.D.2d 669 (People v. Contreras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Contreras, 124 A.D.2d 669, 507 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
Opinion
Contrary to defendant’s claim, the evidence of his guilt of both offenses, including the required proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, was overwhelming (see, People v Bongarzone, 116 AD2d 164; People v Menache, 98 AD2d 335). Lazer, J. P., Niehoff, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Menache
98 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Bongarzone
116 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 669, 507 N.Y.S.2d 838, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-contreras-nyappdiv-1986.