People v. Conroy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Conroy

52 A.D.3d 320, 858 N.Y.S.2d 606

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.3d 320 (People v. Conroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Conroy, 52 A.D.3d 320, 858 N.Y.S.2d 606 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.), rendered December 9, 2005, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminally negligent homicide, and sentencing him to a term of five years’ probation and community service, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility, including its rejection of defendant’s version of the incident. The record is clear that the court based its verdict on its finding that defendant, a police officer, pursued and repeatedly shot the victim without justification. Concur—Tom, J.P, Saxe, Friedman, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.), rendered December 9, 2005, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of criminally negligent homicide, and sentencing him to a term of five years’ probation and community service, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility, including its rejection of defendant’s version of the incident. The record is clear that the court based its verdict on its finding that defendant, a police officer, pursued and repeatedly shot the victim without justification. Concur—Tom, J.P, Saxe, Friedman, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.3d 320, 858 N.Y.S.2d 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conroy-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack