People v. Conrad

83 N.W. 1012, 125 Mich. 1, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 648
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 31, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 83 N.W. 1012 (People v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Conrad, 83 N.W. 1012, 125 Mich. 1, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 648 (Mich. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent Conrad and three others own Hibbard Lake, which contains about 15 acres. It has no inlet or outlet connecting it with other waters. The respondents obtained permission from these owners to spear fish in the lake. Eor this they were arrested and tried, under Act No. 159, Pub. Acts 1891 (sections 5849-5851, 2 Comp. Laws 1897), and upon the trial the court directed the jury to find a verdict of guilty.

Section 1 of the act reads:

“That it shall not be lawful for any person to take, catch, or kill, or attempt to take, catch, or kill, any fish in any of the inland lakes in this State with any kind of spear or graphook, or by the use of jacks or artificial light of any kind, or by the use of set lines or night lines, or any kind of net, or any kind of firearms or explosive, or other device except the hook and line.”

[2]*2This lake is private property. Its owners have entire control over it, and the right to fish in it. The public have no interest in it. If it were connected with other lakes and streams, so that fish might pass in and out of it, others than the owners would then have an interest in the protection of the fish in the lake. This act cannot be construed to include private ponds or lakes, in which the public have no interest.

Judgment reversed, and the respondents discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ohio Water Service Co. v. Ressler
173 Ohio St. (N.S.) 33 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1962)
People v. Miller
235 A.D. 226 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
Putnam v. Kinney
227 N.W. 741 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1929)
People v. Lewis
198 N.W. 957 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1924)
Territory v. Hoy Chong
21 Haw. 39 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1912)
People v. Horling
100 N.W. 691 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 N.W. 1012, 125 Mich. 1, 1900 Mich. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conrad-mich-1900.