People v. Conners

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Conners

262 A.D.2d 234, 692 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7444

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 234 (People v. Conners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Conners, 262 A.D.2d 234, 692 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J., on pretrial motions; Herbert Altman, J., at hearing; Michael Obus, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered March 27, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The identifications of defendant by the purchasing and “ghost” undercover officers were properly found to be confirmatory notwithstanding the passage of IV2 hours between their encounter with defendant in the buy and bust operation and the identifications (see, People v Montgomery, 88 NY2d 926; People v Roberts, 79 NY2d 964). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena Uviller, J., on pretrial motions; Herbert Altman, J., at hearing; Michael Obus, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered March 27, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The identifications of defendant by the purchasing and “ghost” undercover officers were properly found to be confirmatory notwithstanding the passage of IV2 hours between their encounter with defendant in the buy and bust operation and the identifications (see, People v Montgomery, 88 NY2d 926; People v Roberts, 79 NY2d 964). We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 234, 692 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conners-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack