People v. Conklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Conklin

117 A.D.3d 473, 986 N.Y.S.2d 372

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Conklin. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.3d 1387 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 8, 2014·Published

Opinion

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J.), rendered on or about November 2, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Acosta, Andrias, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J.), rendered on or about November 2, 2011, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Acosta, Andrias, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

People v. Conklin, 117 A.D.3d 473, 986 N.Y.S.2d 372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

117 A.D.3d 473 (People v. Conklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.