People v. Conklin
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Barry, J.), rendered August 11, 1992, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen[801]*801dant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Balletta, J. P., Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
194 A.D.2d 800 (People v. Conklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.