People v. Conilio
This text of 243 N.E.2d 751 (People v. Conilio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment modified to the extent of remitting the case to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, and directing a de novo hearing on the issue of voluntariness of the confession introduced as a part of the People’s case at the trial and, as so modified, affirmed. Where, as in the present case, the record clearly indicates that the Judge conducting the Huntley hearing specifically refused or failed to consider relevant evidence adduced on the issue of voluntariness, it cannot be said that a defendant has been afforded an opportunity to have a fair and reliable determination on that issue (Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368, 377). Under such circumstances, a new Huntley hearing is mandated.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 N.E.2d 751, 23 N.Y.2d 701, 296 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conilio-ny-1968.