People v. Conforti
209 N.E.2d 726, 16 N.Y.2d 730, 262 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1202
This text of 209 N.E.2d 726 (People v. Conforti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Conforti, 209 N.E.2d 726, 16 N.Y.2d 730, 262 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1202 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinion
Order affirmed. Aside from the question of whether coram nobis would lie as to some of the issues sought to be presented by appellant, we are concluded as to all his assertions by the affirmed findings of fact below. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 N.E.2d 726, 16 N.Y.2d 730, 262 N.Y.S.2d 110, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-conforti-ny-1965.