People v. Confident
This text of 83 A.D.3d 957 (People v. Confident) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J), rendered May 19, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and reckless driving, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and reckless driving (see People v Verez, 83 NY2d 921, 924 [1994]; Matter of Tamara E., 19 AD3d 489, 490 [2005]; People v O’Brien, 212 AD2d 741, 742 [1995]; People v Scott, 199 AD2d 436 [1993]; People v Hines, 173 AD2d 730, 730-731 [1991]). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Skelos, J.P., Belen, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 A.D.3d 957, 920 N.Y.S.2d 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-confident-nyappdiv-2011.