People v. Concepcion
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00623 (People v. Concepcion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Concepcion |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 00623 |
| Decided on January 31, 2025 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on January 31, 2025
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., BANNISTER, GREENWOOD, NOWAK, AND KEANE, JJ. (Filed Jan. 31, 2025.)
KA 24-00662.
v
JOSE CONCEPCION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
The case is held, the decision is reserved, the motion to relieve counsel of assignment is granted and new counsel is to be assigned. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]) and sentencing him to a determinate term of imprisonment of five years and five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant's assigned appellate counsel has moved to be relieved of the assignment pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38 [4th Dept 1979]).
The predicate felony statement in this matter reflects that defendant was convicted of aggravated harassment of an employee by an incarcerated individual, a class E felony (see Penal Law § 240.32), which is not a violent felony offense (see Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [d]). Thus, the court incorrectly found that defendant had a prior violent felony conviction for purposes of sentencing, and defendant was misinformed as to the minimum term of incarceration to which he was exposed (see Penal Law § 70.06 [6] [c]). Defendant was also misinformed as to the maximum period of postrelease supervision to which he was exposed (see Penal Law § 70.45 [2]). We therefore conclude that a nonfrivolous issue exists as to whether defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent, and we relieve counsel of her assignment and assign new counsel to brief this issue, as well as any other issues that counsel's review of the record may disclose. (Appeal from Judgment of Wyoming County Court, Melissa L. Cianfrini, A.J. - Assault, 2nd Degree).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 00623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-concepcion-nyappdiv-2025.