People v. Commisso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Commisso

199 A.D.2d 331, 606 N.Y.S.2d 992

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 331 (People v. Commisso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Commisso, 199 A.D.2d 331, 606 N.Y.S.2d 992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), both rendered June 18, 1992, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 92/92, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 616/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences, and an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered June 18, 1992, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that the defendant had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous youthful offender adjudication, under Indictment No. 5274/90, involving criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the judgments and the amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Dwyer, J.), both rendered June 18, 1992, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under Indictment No. 92/92, and robbery in the first degree under Indictment No. 616/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences, and an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered June 18, 1992, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that the defendant had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous youthful offender adjudication, under Indictment No. 5274/90, involving criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the judgments and the amended judgment are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 331, 606 N.Y.S.2d 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-commisso-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack