People v. Command
722 N.W.2d 427, 477 Mich. 894
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David Richard COMMAND, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*428 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), and for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals partially dissenting opinion, we REVERSE only that portion of the Court of Appeals judgment that precluded on retrial evidence that the defendant had previously committed a non-consensual sexual penetration of a prior complainant.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Command, 722 N.W.2d 427, 477 Mich. 894 (Mich. 2006).
722 N.W.2d 427 (People v. Command) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.