People v. Command
This text of 722 N.W.2d 427 (People v. Command) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David Richard COMMAND, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*428 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), and for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals partially dissenting opinion, we REVERSE only that portion of the Court of Appeals judgment that precluded on retrial evidence that the defendant had previously committed a non-consensual sexual penetration of a prior complainant.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
722 N.W.2d 427, 477 Mich. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-command-mich-2006.