People v. Comfort
This text of 26 A.D.3d 879 (People v. Comfort) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a sentence of the Monroe County Court (Frank E Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered April 6, 2005. Defendant was sentenced pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act upon his 1986 conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree.
It is hereby ordered that the sentence so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a “new sentence” imposed by County Court pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) upon his 1986 conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.43) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (§ 220.21), both class A-I felonies. We reject defendant’s contention that the determinate term of 20 years’ imprisonment imposed on the conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance is harsh or excessive (see L 2004, ch 738, § 23). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Gorski and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 879, 810 N.Y.S.2d 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-comfort-nyappdiv-2006.