People v. Colt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Colt

39 A.D.3d 770, 832 N.Y.S.2d 441

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered June 16, 2005, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not entitled to have the court,mandate his entry into a comprehensive alcohol and substance abuse treatment program while incarcerated since he was not convicted of a drug-related offense (see Penal Law § 60.04 [6]). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the court failed to inform him of a direct consequence of his plea (see People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242 [2005]). Miller, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered June 16, 2005, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not entitled to have the court,mandate his entry into a comprehensive alcohol and substance abuse treatment program while incarcerated since he was not convicted of a drug-related offense (see Penal Law § 60.04 [6]). There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the court failed to inform him of a direct consequence of his plea (see People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242 [2005]). Miller, J.P., Santucci, Florio and Lifson, JJ., concur.

People v. Colt, 39 A.D.3d 770, 832 N.Y.S.2d 441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

39 A.D.3d 770 (People v. Colt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related