People v. Colson

2019 NY Slip Op 5415
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 2019
DocketInd. No. 2178/16
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 5415 (People v. Colson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colson, 2019 NY Slip Op 5415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Colson (2019 NY Slip Op 05415)
People v Colson
2019 NY Slip Op 05415
Decided on July 3, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 3, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2017-07060
(Ind. No. 2178/16)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Robert E. Colson, appellant.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (William J. Condon, J.), rendered June 5, 2017, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his plea of guilty should be vacated because the sentencing court failed to ask the defendant if he wanted to withdraw his plea in light of certain comments the defendant made at sentencing. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the subject comments did not cast significant doubt upon his guilt or otherwise call into question the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Williams, 27 NY3d 212, 220; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). Therefore, the County Court was not under a duty to inquire further into the validity of the plea or to offer the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing sentence (see People v Taylor, 60 AD3d 708, 709; People v Conti, 285 AD2d 557; see generally People v Lopez, 71 NY2d at 666).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MALTESE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. Christian Williams
51 N.E.3d 528 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Taylor
60 A.D.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Conti
285 A.D.2d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 5415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colson-nyappdiv-2019.