People v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Colon

246 A.D.2d 604, 667 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 366

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 604 (People v. Colon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Colon, 246 A.D.2d 604, 667 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), rendered July 29, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Sherman, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. By decision and order dated June 3, 1996, this Court reversed the judgment, on the law, and ordered a new trial (see, People v Colon, 228 AD2d 449). On June 5, 1997, the Court of Appeals reversed the order of this Court and remitted the matter to this Court for consideration of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.25 (2) (d) and 470.40 (2) (b) (see, People u Colon, 90 NY2d 824).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has raised no factual issues other than those considered and rejected in our prior decision and order (see, People v Colon, supra, at 449). Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), rendered July 29, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Sherman, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. By decision and order dated June 3, 1996, this Court reversed the judgment, on the law, and ordered a new trial (see, People v Colon, 228 AD2d 449). On June 5, 1997, the Court of Appeals reversed the order of this Court and remitted the matter to this Court for consideration of the facts pursuant to CPL 470.25 (2) (d) and 470.40 (2) (b) (see, People u Colon, 90 NY2d 824).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has raised no factual issues other than those considered and rejected in our prior decision and order (see, People v Colon, supra, at 449). Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 604, 667 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colon-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack