People v. Colon

235 A.D.2d 305, 653 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 497
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 305 (People v. Colon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colon, 235 A.D.2d 305, 653 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), rendered March 2, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 17 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge the justification defense, as it was not supported by any reasonable view of the evidence, which included testimony that the victim had left the scene of the initial confrontation, and that although defendant could have retreated in complete safety, he nevertheless pursued the unarmed victim with the intention of shooting him (see, People v Johnson, 125 AD2d 493, lv denied 69 NY2d 882).

The trial court properly precluded proposed hearsay evidence because the reliability of such evidence was in question [306]*306and the proposed evidence was not vital to the defense (see, Crane v Kentucky, 476 US 683, 689-690).

Defendant was not prejudiced by a comment made during the People’s summation suggesting choice of defense, as the trial court sustained defendant’s objection and struck the comment. In all other respects, the comments complained of constituted fair comment on the evidence (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396).

In light of defendant’s request, granted by the trial court, for a preliminary instruction regarding a possible justification defense, and the ensuing developments at trial, the trial court properly instructed the jury in its final charge that self-defense was not an issue in the case. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Alston
264 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D.2d 305, 653 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colon-nyappdiv-1997.