People v. Colon
140 A.D.2d 536, 528 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Colon. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.2d 151 →
Opinion
Under the circumstances, we find that the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his pleas without holding an evidentiary hearing (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Colon, 140 A.D.2d 536, 528 N.Y.S.2d 350, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5464 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 536 (People v. Colon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Tinsley
324 N.E.2d 544 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)