People v. Colon

274 N.E.2d 746, 29 N.Y.2d 676, 325 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1068
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Colon. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 N.Y.2d 1
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 6, 1971·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant J ose Colon, under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, were violated by the admission of testimony relating to the delivery of car keys by defendant to his arresting officer in the absence of [677]*677the requisite warnings (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436). The Court of Appeals considered this contention and held that there was no violation of defendant’s constitutional rights (see 29 NY 2d 600).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Colon, 274 N.E.2d 746, 29 N.Y.2d 676, 325 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1068 (N.Y. 1971).

274 N.E.2d 746 (People v. Colon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
People v. Colon
273 N.E.2d 132 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)