People v. Colombe

2026 NY Slip Op 00285
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2026
DocketCR-22-2012
StatusPublished

This text of 2026 NY Slip Op 00285 (People v. Colombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Colombe, 2026 NY Slip Op 00285 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Colombe (2026 NY Slip Op 00285)
People v Colombe
2026 NY Slip Op 00285
Decided on January 22, 2026
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:January 22, 2026

CR-22-2012

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Gerald Colombe, Appellant.


Calendar Date:January 2, 2026
Before:Clark, J.P., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and Mackey, JJ.

Lisa A. Burgess, Indian Lake, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Taylor Fitzsimmons of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Kelly McKeighan, J.), rendered September 23, 2022, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a nine-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of seven years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of representing defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, counsel's brief and defendant's pro se submissions, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed, and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [3d Dept 1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Clark, J.P., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and Mackey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Beaty
5 N.E.3d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2026 NY Slip Op 00285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colombe-nyappdiv-2026.