People v. Collins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Collins

280 A.D.2d 486, 719 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1251

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 486 (People v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Collins, 280 A.D.2d 486, 719 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered June 17, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that during the course of jury selection, the court improperly allowed the prosecutor to exercise a race-based peremptory challenge in violation of Batson v Ken[487]*487tucky (476 US 79). Appellate review of this issue was forfeited upon the defendant’s plea of guilty (see, People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227, 231; People v Green, 75 NY2d 902). Furthermore, as part of his plea bargain, the defendant voluntarily waived appellate review of this issue and his contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered June 17, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that during the course of jury selection, the court improperly allowed the prosecutor to exercise a race-based peremptory challenge in violation of Batson v Ken[487]*487tucky (476 US 79). Appellate review of this issue was forfeited upon the defendant’s plea of guilty (see, People v Hansen, 95 NY2d 227, 231; People v Green, 75 NY2d 902). Furthermore, as part of his plea bargain, the defendant voluntarily waived appellate review of this issue and his contention that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence (see, People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D.2d 486, 719 N.Y.S.2d 899, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-collins-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack