People v. Collins
This text of 292 N.E.2d 319 (People v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed and. the information dismissed. The defendant’s guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. We thoroughly agree with District Attorney Hogan’s frank and commendable concession to that effect and with his conclusion that “ The judgment appealed from should be reversed”. In this view, we do not reach the constitutional issue posed by the defendant.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Bergan and Gibson. Judges Scileppi, Breitel and Jasen dissent and vote to affirm upon the grounds that defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt and section 240.25 (subd. 2) of the Penal Law is constitutional. We think the concession by the District Attorney was improvident, holding that in the context of this event the words used by the defendant were intended to provoke a person charged with the responsibility of maintaining prder and demonstrating his capacity to do so.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
292 N.E.2d 319, 31 N.Y.2d 878, 340 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-collins-ny-1972.