People v. Coley
This text of 184 N.Y.S.3d 668 (People v. Coley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Coley |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 01623 |
| Decided on March 24, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on March 24, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
240 KA 19-01494
v
MICHAEL . COLEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ADAM AMIRAULT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
KEVIN T. FINNELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Charles N. Zambito, J.), rendered June 4, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law
§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see People v Terry, 203 AD3d 1578, 1578 [4th Dept 2022], lv denied 38 NY3d 1010 [2022]), we perceive no basis in the record to exercise our power to modify the negotiated sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).
We note, however, that the certificate of conviction erroneously states that defendant was convicted of attempted burglary in the first degree, and it must be amended to reflect that defendant was convicted of attempted robbery in the first degree (see generally People v Thurston, 208 AD3d 1629, 1630 [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: March 24, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 N.Y.S.3d 668, 2023 NY Slip Op 01623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coley-nyappdiv-2023.